Website audit · 22 June 2026

Terra Firma Landscapes

terrafirmalandscapes.co.uk
60/ 100

Below average · local business

A solid local landscaping site with real credentials that's being held back by thin schema, missing review data, and a founding-date inconsistency that quietly undermines trust.

Terra Firma Landscapes has the bones of a trustworthy local business site — accreditations, clear services, contact details, and a LocalBusiness schema block — but it squanders its authority by never surfacing actual customer reviews on the pages scraped, carrying a confusing '1985 vs incorporated 2020' date conflict, and deploying structured data that lacks AggregateRating, ServiceArea, and Service entities that AI and search engines need to confidently recommend it. The free-survey page is almost content-free, wasting a high-intent conversion moment, and all image alt tags in the scraped content are empty, costing both SEO and accessibility points.

The breakdown · 7 dimensions, worst first

01

AI & LLM Visibility

52

The site has a LocalBusiness JSON-LD block with address, geo-coordinates, telephone, opening hours, sameAs social links, and an additionalType pointing to Landscape_architecture — this is a meaningful head start. However, the schema is missing AggregateRating (no review count or star score), hasOfferCatalog or Service entities for the seven distinct services offered, and a ServiceArea or areaServed property to tell AI systems which London boroughs or postcodes are covered. The founding-date conflict (homepage says 'Established in 1985'; Companies House shows incorporated 2020; LinkedIn says 'Founded 2020') is a factual inconsistency that will cause AI models to distrust or omit the business when generating recommendations. The priceRange is set to '$' which is inconsistent with the 'luxury' positioning stated in the copy.

02

Design & Brand

55

Heading hierarchy is broadly logical — one H1 per page, H3s for service cards — but every single image in the scraped content has an empty alt attribute (e.g. the hero image, all six service card images, all accreditation logos). This is a significant accessibility and SEO failure. The logo image also lacks alt text. The 'Our process' page title in the browser tab reads 'How we work – Terra Firma Landscapes' while the nav label says 'Our process', creating a minor but unnecessary inconsistency.

03

SEO Foundations

61

The site does rank on page one for its own brand name (result #4), which is the baseline expectation. However, it appears below its own Facebook page and a Companies House listing, suggesting weak domain authority for branded queries. The page title 'Your London based landscaping company, Terra Firma Landscapes' is serviceable but front-loads a generic descriptor rather than the brand name. The free-survey subpage has almost no body content beyond a heading and logos, making it essentially unindexable for any meaningful keyword. Internal linking to service sub-pages (paving, timberwork, etc.) is present, which is positive.

04

Messaging & Copy

62

The copy communicates a clear luxury-leaning value proposition ('a garden your guests will envy', 'bespoke and personalised end product') and the four brand values (Tenacity, Compassion, Integrity, Solidity) add personality. However, the meta description — 'Our expert company is passionate about providing excellent landscaping. We will create a masterpiece' — is generic and wastes the 160-character opportunity to mention London, the 1985 founding, or a specific differentiator. CTAs are repetitive ('Contact us today' appears at least three times on the homepage) without escalating commitment or varying the offer.

05

Conversion

64

The 'Free survey' CTA is prominently placed in the navigation and repeated throughout the homepage, which is good. Phone number is clickable (tel: link) and appears in the header. However, the /free-survey page itself contains no form — visitors are simply told to call or email, which adds friction and loses leads who prefer async contact. The contact page does list full business details (address, company reg, VAT number, opening hours) but the scraped content shows no embedded contact form on that page either, only a reference to one. The brochure download is gated behind a form popup but the download link is '#', suggesting it may not be functional.

06

First Impression

66

The hero headline 'Transforming your garden before your eyes' is punchy and the H1 'Meet your London based luxury landscaping company' quickly signals the niche and geography. Phone number and email are visible in the header bar, which is good practice. However, the hero CTA splits attention between 'Garden design' and 'Our process' — neither is a direct conversion action — and the brochure download popup is a friction point that fires before trust is established.

07

Trust & Authority

71

Trust signals are genuinely strong: 11 accreditation/partner logos are displayed (Which? Trusted Trader, TrustMark, Marshalls, Jackson's Fencing, HTA, City & Guilds, CHAS, BNI, Association of Professional Landscapers), company registration number (12475854) and VAT number are published on the contact page, and a physical address is provided. The 'Why choose us' Google result mentions owner Luke Richards by name with a compelling backstory (Royal Engineers, London Fire Brigade). However, none of the scraped pages surface actual customer testimonials with names, dates, or star ratings — only links to a /testimonials page — so the social proof is deferred rather than present.

We found 12 specific fixes for terrafirmalandscapes.co.uk

The problems are above. The fixes are ready.

This page shows what's broken. We've already mapped exactly how to fix every issue — the rewrites, the schema, the structure, in priority order. Want the full fix list for terrafirmalandscapes.co.uk?

Get the fix list →

Free · delivered by Optimize Labs

Want this for your own site? Run a free audit →